It referred towards the ruling by the Supreme Court but considered the concern of issuing a married relationship permit to same-sex partners to be varied through the concern of acknowledging same-sex partnerships that are domestic.
The panel that tried this situation had been comprised of five justices therefore the vote had been four to 1 in support of the proper associated with the lesbian few to be released a married relationship permit (and, consequently, needless to say, get hitched).
In this full instance, there was clearly contract among the list of bulk in regards to the foundation for the choice. The point was to determine “whether the reasoning applied in the case of domestic partnership by the Supreme Court can also be applied to the case of marriage license to people of the same sex” in the words of the rapporteur, Minister Luis Felipe Salomao. 26 He is the ruling by the Supreme Court and concludes it “has suggested that the ruling used if so might be put on situations beyond same-sex domestic partnerships” (Superior Tribunal de Justica, note 37, p. 12).
The dissenting vote is founded on an understanding that is different of ruling by the Supreme Court. In accordance with Minister Raul Araujo, their peers are building an interpretation that is wrong of Supreme Court ruling and broadening its initial range (Superior Tribunal de Justica, note 37, p. 36). (mais…)